Thursday, January 29, 2009
Final thought for this evening
Did you all know that Nancy Pelosi is third in line of Presidential succession? That's right, if we lose King Barack and his clown prince Biden, Crazy Nancy would be sworn in as President? Sleep well.
Still waiting
I sent a letter to the editor for the Denton Wretched Chronicle about a story in last Saturday's paper. Mike Trimble called me to let me know that they would publish it. I always enjoy seeing one of my letters make the paper. Still, as of today (Thursday), my letter still has not appeared. It will probably show up tomorrow.
I have questions, though:
1. Why can't a newspaper reporter write a news story that is pure objective, unemotional fact? Why do they want to subjectively editorialize about the information they are trying to convey?
2. Why does our government seem to want to protect the rights of the criminals and terrorists, yet kill innocent unborn children with nary a thought about it?
3. Why doesn't our government pursue the deaths of terrorists, rapists, and murderers as zealously as it seems to pursue the deaths of innocent unborn children?
I have questions, though:
1. Why can't a newspaper reporter write a news story that is pure objective, unemotional fact? Why do they want to subjectively editorialize about the information they are trying to convey?
2. Why does our government seem to want to protect the rights of the criminals and terrorists, yet kill innocent unborn children with nary a thought about it?
3. Why doesn't our government pursue the deaths of terrorists, rapists, and murderers as zealously as it seems to pursue the deaths of innocent unborn children?
And yet a second ice day
Nice bonus except for having to cram the whole week in to one day when we got back. Still, a break is always nice.
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Ice Day
I just found out that the Wise County Offices are closed and the Denton ISD is also closed for the day.
Monday, January 26, 2009
Only one game left
I had football withdrawal this weekend. It was the worst from noon until 10:30 Sunday night. I really hate the end of football season, especially the way the Cowboys let it end.
Do we really have to put up with Wade Phillips for another season? That is the most lost looking head coach I've seen since Dave Campo.
Please get rid of Pacman and "Mouth" Owens.
Do we really have to put up with Wade Phillips for another season? That is the most lost looking head coach I've seen since Dave Campo.
Please get rid of Pacman and "Mouth" Owens.
Nancy Pelosi strikes again!
Okay, so I'm driving into work this morning, and I have this cool XM radio in my new car, and this XM radio has a station called "America Right". This station has added to my list of conservative gurus.
I have been aware of Laura Ingraham, but I had never had a chance to listen to her until I got this satellite radio. I could listen to this woman talk all day long.
Anyway, the new subject this morning is the amount of the federal bailout money being allocated for the purpose of "family planning", i.e. contraception and abortion.
We are talking about billions of federal tax dollars out a trillion dollar package spent the either stop the creation of children or to kill them once they are conceived.
Now, we already know that King Barack has said that the question of when life actually starts, either scientifically or theologically, is "above [his] pay grade." Therefore, not knowing the answer to that question and instead of erring on the side of caution (outlawing abortion), he wants to allocate tax dollars to let people murder children at any stage of the pregnancy, and in some cases, while they are being born or after they are born alive.
So, Laura Ingraham has this interview that Nancy Pelosi did with George Stef...Steph...(you know, Clinton's "hey boy" who is now allowed on the air waves). He reiterates King Barack's pay grade comment, and asks her how she would answer the question of when life begins in a conceived child.
Nancy starts her reply with "as an ardent, practicing Catholic" she is aware that even the most diligent Catholic doctors have been unable to answer that question.
Excuse me, Nancy. The Catholic Church's postion on this is that life begins at conception, period. If she does anything to support the practice of abortion, aka, killing children innocently sleeping in their mothers' wombs, then she is turning her back on the teaching of the Church. So, she lies when she claims to be an "ardent practicing Catholic". An ardent practicing Catholic does not use contraceptive devices or medications, nor does she obtain an abortion once she is pregnant. The intentional killing of the unborn child is a mortal sin, and if one dies with the stain of mortal sin on their soul, they will never see heaven. That is the teaching of the Catholic Church. Of course, a mortal sin confessed with penance done will be forgiven. If I were Nancy's parish priest hearing her confession and understanding her position on this, her penance would be to get her crazy, liberal, baby killing butt out there and reverse her positon on abortion, stop using American tax dollars to assist and promote abortion, and move Congress to outlaw this awful practice.
She went on to say that the stimulus money for family planning was to help the states that are in dire financial straits. I guess she is referring to welfare rolls, public schools, and children's programs. She figures that fewer children alive will be less of a burden on state budgets.
What about the fact that allowing more children to live and grow up to produce income will increase the tax base and insure the social security will remain solvent and able to do what we have been paying it our whole lives to do: help us in our later years?
I have been aware of Laura Ingraham, but I had never had a chance to listen to her until I got this satellite radio. I could listen to this woman talk all day long.
Anyway, the new subject this morning is the amount of the federal bailout money being allocated for the purpose of "family planning", i.e. contraception and abortion.
We are talking about billions of federal tax dollars out a trillion dollar package spent the either stop the creation of children or to kill them once they are conceived.
Now, we already know that King Barack has said that the question of when life actually starts, either scientifically or theologically, is "above [his] pay grade." Therefore, not knowing the answer to that question and instead of erring on the side of caution (outlawing abortion), he wants to allocate tax dollars to let people murder children at any stage of the pregnancy, and in some cases, while they are being born or after they are born alive.
So, Laura Ingraham has this interview that Nancy Pelosi did with George Stef...Steph...(you know, Clinton's "hey boy" who is now allowed on the air waves). He reiterates King Barack's pay grade comment, and asks her how she would answer the question of when life begins in a conceived child.
Nancy starts her reply with "as an ardent, practicing Catholic" she is aware that even the most diligent Catholic doctors have been unable to answer that question.
Excuse me, Nancy. The Catholic Church's postion on this is that life begins at conception, period. If she does anything to support the practice of abortion, aka, killing children innocently sleeping in their mothers' wombs, then she is turning her back on the teaching of the Church. So, she lies when she claims to be an "ardent practicing Catholic". An ardent practicing Catholic does not use contraceptive devices or medications, nor does she obtain an abortion once she is pregnant. The intentional killing of the unborn child is a mortal sin, and if one dies with the stain of mortal sin on their soul, they will never see heaven. That is the teaching of the Catholic Church. Of course, a mortal sin confessed with penance done will be forgiven. If I were Nancy's parish priest hearing her confession and understanding her position on this, her penance would be to get her crazy, liberal, baby killing butt out there and reverse her positon on abortion, stop using American tax dollars to assist and promote abortion, and move Congress to outlaw this awful practice.
She went on to say that the stimulus money for family planning was to help the states that are in dire financial straits. I guess she is referring to welfare rolls, public schools, and children's programs. She figures that fewer children alive will be less of a burden on state budgets.
What about the fact that allowing more children to live and grow up to produce income will increase the tax base and insure the social security will remain solvent and able to do what we have been paying it our whole lives to do: help us in our later years?
Sunday, January 25, 2009
This woman should have no credibility left after this column
Saturday's column by Susan "Estrogen" Estrich absolutely takes the cake. Anyone who has read her columns regularly should see this latest entry as the biggest pack of lies since Billy Clinton testified before any group.
She starts with "I don't hate George Bush. I never have."
Is she kidding with this? She hates George Bush if anybody does. She has never respected his office or the job he did in leading and protecting this country.
This woman is a Hillary lackey, a democrat party minion, and a liberal harpy. Molly Ivins left the picture, but they found someone worse than her, if that was ever possible.
All of a sudden, since King Barack's coronation, the office of the President deserves respect?
Let me tell you something: the respect of the office of the President of the United States is seriously in question as of coronation day.
When the man's first act as President is to sanction the use of federal money to murder unborn children, what does he have in store for the rest of us?
Is the rest true:
-no more parental notification when your minor daughter wants an abortion?
-no limit on how far along the pregnancy is?
-communism/socialism?
-more government takeover of private business?
-higher taxes?
-tax refunds to people who don't pay a dime in taxes?
-release of terrorists who have been positively identified as enemies of the U.S?
-open borders to illegally entering the country?
-more terrorist attacks on American soil?
-legalized use of drugs and marihuana?
-more federal power?
-less state power?
-inflation of the like that hasn't been seen since the Carter administration?
And what else?
What does it say to you when someone like Susan Estrich prints such a pack of lies and expects you, the American voter, to swallow it? It should say that the left thinks we don't have the sense to come in out of the rain. They think they can do whatever they want, and their line of b---sh-- will protect them from the revelations that come from shining a light on them.
She starts with "I don't hate George Bush. I never have."
Is she kidding with this? She hates George Bush if anybody does. She has never respected his office or the job he did in leading and protecting this country.
This woman is a Hillary lackey, a democrat party minion, and a liberal harpy. Molly Ivins left the picture, but they found someone worse than her, if that was ever possible.
All of a sudden, since King Barack's coronation, the office of the President deserves respect?
Let me tell you something: the respect of the office of the President of the United States is seriously in question as of coronation day.
When the man's first act as President is to sanction the use of federal money to murder unborn children, what does he have in store for the rest of us?
Is the rest true:
-no more parental notification when your minor daughter wants an abortion?
-no limit on how far along the pregnancy is?
-communism/socialism?
-more government takeover of private business?
-higher taxes?
-tax refunds to people who don't pay a dime in taxes?
-release of terrorists who have been positively identified as enemies of the U.S?
-open borders to illegally entering the country?
-more terrorist attacks on American soil?
-legalized use of drugs and marihuana?
-more federal power?
-less state power?
-inflation of the like that hasn't been seen since the Carter administration?
And what else?
What does it say to you when someone like Susan Estrich prints such a pack of lies and expects you, the American voter, to swallow it? It should say that the left thinks we don't have the sense to come in out of the rain. They think they can do whatever they want, and their line of b---sh-- will protect them from the revelations that come from shining a light on them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
