Comments

1. Liberals don't like Ann Coulter, but conservatives are elated by her statements. She is about freedom and truth, and both of those things require less government

2. It's king barack's minions who wanted to call his administration, his "rule" after he was elected.

3. I don't hate the guy, I fear what he is doing to the country. Also, by the way, that Rahm Emmanuel guy is very scary ("you can't let a good crisis go to waste.")

4. Teachers? There are good ones and there are bad ones. I had both all through high school. Looking back, I would say that the teachers were of higher quality in my private school years than in my public school years.

5. And Nancy Pelosi? Once again, have you ever listened to the woman speak? She is a walking incongruency. Think about it. She is what those crazy San Francisco people picked for a representative. She's the one who calls herself "an ardent practicing Catholic" who won't defend the right of a child to be born and have a life. She is the person who forces a higher wage on our business owners under the minimum wage law, but she excludes the workers of American Samoa who can tuna for Starkist and Chicken of the Sea, both of whom are subsidiaries of Del Monte, one of Nancy's largest corporate constituents in San Francisco. Wow. Under any definition, she is out there alone.

6. Legislation telling radio stations what programs they have to carry is a direct violation of the First Amendment Right to Free Speech. The reason radio stations carry conservative talk radio is that it attracts an audience, and it attracts much better than liberal talk radio. A larger audience means more advertising revenue. More revenue is better for the economy. If you start telling these successful radio stations that they have to devote a certain number of hours to liberal talk radio, they will lose audience during those times. They will lose revenue, and once again the liberals strike a blow against freedom.

7. Taxing people just to be able to give money to other people is just wrong, and there is no basis or support for it in the U.S. Constitution. The "fundamental right" you claim for all to have medical care? That means that we have a "fundamental right" to reach into our neighbors' pockets to fund our needs or wants that we cannot fund on our own. Where is that right written? In the Constitution? In the Bible? In the Koran? It is nowhere because the right don't exist. No one has a right to charity. No one has a right to take the money of another citizen. Such "rights" only exist in the socialistic, Marxist, communist society, and that is a society where talent and hard work count for nothing because others become "entitled" to the fruit of your labor.

8. We are not "dog eat dog" nor are we a nation that falls together. We are a nation of free people who will not tolerate tyranny or bondage in any form.

The bottom line is that all of these things that you support erode our fundamental liberties and right to live our own lives. That's it.

I think I should point our more of Ann's columns. This is the most comments I have gotten yet.